<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1012 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369046</link>
    <description>The appellants, including State Bank of India and other banks, were granted a prior right over movable and immovable properties of Respondent Nos. 3, 4 &amp;amp; 5 by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Bengaluru. The Tribunal allowed condonation of delay in filing appeals due to delayed receipt of the impugned order. It was noted that no notice under Section 8(1) was issued to the appellants before the order was passed. The Tribunal affirmed the priority of secured creditors over attached properties, emphasizing the banks&#039; right to recover loan amounts. An interim order was granted to maintain status quo on the properties until the next hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1012 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369046</link>
      <description>The appellants, including State Bank of India and other banks, were granted a prior right over movable and immovable properties of Respondent Nos. 3, 4 &amp;amp; 5 by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Bengaluru. The Tribunal allowed condonation of delay in filing appeals due to delayed receipt of the impugned order. It was noted that no notice under Section 8(1) was issued to the appellants before the order was passed. The Tribunal affirmed the priority of secured creditors over attached properties, emphasizing the banks&#039; right to recover loan amounts. An interim order was granted to maintain status quo on the properties until the next hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>