<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369044</link>
    <description>A summary suit may be decreed forthwith where the defendant is duly served but neither enters appearance nor seeks leave to defend, and the record contains admissions of liability. Order XIII-A was found inapplicable to the commercial dispute, but the application was treated under Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(a), enabling judgment in the plaintiff&#039;s favour. On interest, an express contractual stipulation for delayed payment governed the award, with Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure supporting the agreed rate. Costs were also awarded because the defendant did not contest the claim and prolonged the litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369044</link>
      <description>A summary suit may be decreed forthwith where the defendant is duly served but neither enters appearance nor seeks leave to defend, and the record contains admissions of liability. Order XIII-A was found inapplicable to the commercial dispute, but the application was treated under Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(a), enabling judgment in the plaintiff&#039;s favour. On interest, an express contractual stipulation for delayed payment governed the award, with Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure supporting the agreed rate. Costs were also awarded because the defendant did not contest the claim and prolonged the litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>