<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1007 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369041</link>
    <description>Grant-in-aid received for a skill development programme was treated as non-taxable because it was not consideration for any taxable service, and contributions from non-governmental agencies were also outside service tax due to the absence of a service provider-service receiver nexus. Services rendered to Special Economic Zone units were held exempt under the Special Economic Zones Act, which prevails over the service tax law for authorised operations. A demand based only on a balance-sheet difference could not stand without identification of the specific taxable service. Services rendered to International Financial Corporation were likewise treated as not liable to service tax, and the related demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:57:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1007 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369041</link>
      <description>Grant-in-aid received for a skill development programme was treated as non-taxable because it was not consideration for any taxable service, and contributions from non-governmental agencies were also outside service tax due to the absence of a service provider-service receiver nexus. Services rendered to Special Economic Zone units were held exempt under the Special Economic Zones Act, which prevails over the service tax law for authorised operations. A demand based only on a balance-sheet difference could not stand without identification of the specific taxable service. Services rendered to International Financial Corporation were likewise treated as not liable to service tax, and the related demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>