<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1653 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that no personal use of car or telephone expenses could be attributed to a company assessee. Citing a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, the Tribunal concluded that adhoc disallowance for personal use by company assesses was not justified. As the Departmental Representative failed to provide a contrary decision, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of 1/6th of telephone and car expenses incurred by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1653 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that no personal use of car or telephone expenses could be attributed to a company assessee. Citing a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, the Tribunal concluded that adhoc disallowance for personal use by company assesses was not justified. As the Departmental Representative failed to provide a contrary decision, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of 1/6th of telephone and car expenses incurred by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>