<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 986 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275840</link>
    <description>Municipal taxation under Part IX-A was examined through the State&#039;s enabling power to authorise levy, collection and regulation of local taxes. The Court upheld the Local Body Tax regime, holding that municipal taxing powers remain subject to State legislative control and that the scheme did not abrogate municipal self-government. It also rejected the challenge to the rules, finding that publication in the Official Gazette satisfied the required previous publication, and declined to accept the trade-and-commerce challenge because no unconstitutional restriction or discrimination was shown. The statutory framework and connected notifications were therefore sustained as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 986 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275840</link>
      <description>Municipal taxation under Part IX-A was examined through the State&#039;s enabling power to authorise levy, collection and regulation of local taxes. The Court upheld the Local Body Tax regime, holding that municipal taxing powers remain subject to State legislative control and that the scheme did not abrogate municipal self-government. It also rejected the challenge to the rules, finding that publication in the Official Gazette satisfied the required previous publication, and declined to accept the trade-and-commerce challenge because no unconstitutional restriction or discrimination was shown. The statutory framework and connected notifications were therefore sustained as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>