https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275833 Rule 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 created a substantive entitlement for a verified claimant in occupation of allottable property to seek transfer in satisfaction of compensation, and that entitlement vested when the application was made. The Sixth Amendment abrogating Rule 30 was held not to operate retrospectively because neither the amending notification nor the parent Act showed clear and unmistakable retrospective intent, and Section 40 did not authorise retrospective delegated legislation. The claimant's accrued right therefore remained governed by Rule 30 as it stood on the date of application, not by the later position at the time of decision. en-us Wed, 18 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:10:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275833 Rule 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 created a substantive entitlement for a verified claimant in occupation of allottable property to seek transfer in satisfaction of compensation, and that entitlement vested when the application was made. The Sixth Amendment abrogating Rule 30 was held not to operate retrospectively because neither the amending notification nor the parent Act showed clear and unmistakable retrospective intent, and Section 40 did not authorise retrospective delegated legislation. The claimant's accrued right therefore remained governed by Rule 30 as it stood on the date of application, not by the later position at the time of decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275833