https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275832 The court held that the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950, did not affect the validity of the contracts and agreements made by the petitioners before the specified date. The petitioners were not considered proprietors under the Act, and their rights under the contracts remained intact. Consequently, the court issued a writ prohibiting the State from interfering with the petitioners' enjoyment of their contractual rights and ordered the respondent State to pay the petitioners their respective costs. en-us Mon, 22 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275832 The court held that the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950, did not affect the validity of the contracts and agreements made by the petitioners before the specified date. The petitioners were not considered proprietors under the Act, and their rights under the contracts remained intact. Consequently, the court issued a writ prohibiting the State from interfering with the petitioners' enjoyment of their contractual rights and ordered the respondent State to pay the petitioners their respective costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275832