https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275830 Rule 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955, as applied by Rule 43 to government-built property, formed part of the substantive scheme for determining competing compensation claims and was not a mere procedural device. The rule governed allocation where more than one occupant claimed the property, by requiring preference to the person with the highest gross compensation. Its deletion in 1963 was not retrospective and could not be implied so as to disturb rights and proceedings that had already accrued and been acted upon. The claim therefore remained governed by Rule 30 as it stood when the dispute arose, and the earlier-accrued rights were preserved. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:32:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275830 Rule 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955, as applied by Rule 43 to government-built property, formed part of the substantive scheme for determining competing compensation claims and was not a mere procedural device. The rule governed allocation where more than one occupant claimed the property, by requiring preference to the person with the highest gross compensation. Its deletion in 1963 was not retrospective and could not be implied so as to disturb rights and proceedings that had already accrued and been acted upon. The claim therefore remained governed by Rule 30 as it stood when the dispute arose, and the earlier-accrued rights were preserved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275830