https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275829 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeals and upholding the validity of the land acquisition process. It was determined that the acquisition was for a development plan under Section 52(2)(c) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, not requiring a "building scheme" under Section 192. The Court also found the publication of the Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to be proper, noted that opportunities were provided for objections under Section 5A, and rejected claims of discrimination in the acquisition process. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275829 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeals and upholding the validity of the land acquisition process. It was determined that the acquisition was for a development plan under Section 52(2)(c) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, not requiring a "building scheme" under Section 192. The Court also found the publication of the Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to be proper, noted that opportunities were provided for objections under Section 5A, and rejected claims of discrimination in the acquisition process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275829