https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275828 The court held that the suit was not barred by the award as it needed to be made a rule of the court to be enforceable under the Arbitration Act, 1940. The court found the suit maintainable despite the award not being filed under Section 14(2) of the Act, as the claim was based on the plaintiffs' original title, not the award. Additionally, the court upheld the findings of fact regarding properties in Schedules B and C, dismissing the appeal and directing the inclusion of the property in Schedule D in the plaint and decree. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:48:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275828 The court held that the suit was not barred by the award as it needed to be made a rule of the court to be enforceable under the Arbitration Act, 1940. The court found the suit maintainable despite the award not being filed under Section 14(2) of the Act, as the claim was based on the plaintiffs' original title, not the award. Additionally, the court upheld the findings of fact regarding properties in Schedules B and C, dismissing the appeal and directing the inclusion of the property in Schedule D in the plaint and decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Sep 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275828