<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 499 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275822</link>
    <description>Section 3-AAAA could be applied only on a clear foundational finding that the selling dealer was not liable to tax; in the absence of such a finding, liability could not be sustained merely on an assumption that purchases were from small agriculturists or dealers below the turnover limit. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on that basis, without an earlier factual foundation, was unsustainable. Where the assessee had not furnished complete particulars of all selling dealers, the proper course was remand for a fresh inquiry into the dealers&#039; tax liability and then consequential decision on the dispute, including any interest question under Section 8(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:43:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 499 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275822</link>
      <description>Section 3-AAAA could be applied only on a clear foundational finding that the selling dealer was not liable to tax; in the absence of such a finding, liability could not be sustained merely on an assumption that purchases were from small agriculturists or dealers below the turnover limit. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on that basis, without an earlier factual foundation, was unsustainable. Where the assessee had not furnished complete particulars of all selling dealers, the proper course was remand for a fresh inquiry into the dealers&#039; tax liability and then consequential decision on the dispute, including any interest question under Section 8(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>