<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (7) TMI 81 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275820</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the reference applications as the issues raised were not brought up or decided during the revision proceedings. The court clarified that the Additional Judge (Revisions) did not enhance the turnover but determined it at a different figure, not exceeding the initial assessment. The court found that the estimate of turnover by the Additional Judge was not arbitrary, as relying on the turnover of the preceding year is a common practice. Costs were awarded to the respondent, and counsel&#039;s fees were assessed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (7) TMI 81 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275820</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the reference applications as the issues raised were not brought up or decided during the revision proceedings. The court clarified that the Additional Judge (Revisions) did not enhance the turnover but determined it at a different figure, not exceeding the initial assessment. The court found that the estimate of turnover by the Additional Judge was not arbitrary, as relying on the turnover of the preceding year is a common practice. Costs were awarded to the respondent, and counsel&#039;s fees were assessed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>