<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (6) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275819</link>
    <description>The court confirmed that a partner&#039;s interest in partnership assets is movable property, upheld the jurisdiction of the Commercial Subordinate Judge, and validated the sale proclamation&#039;s validity. The appeal was dismissed due to the failure to timely implead the legal representatives of deceased respondents, leading to its abatement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (6) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275819</link>
      <description>The court confirmed that a partner&#039;s interest in partnership assets is movable property, upheld the jurisdiction of the Commercial Subordinate Judge, and validated the sale proclamation&#039;s validity. The appeal was dismissed due to the failure to timely implead the legal representatives of deceased respondents, leading to its abatement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>