<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (6) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275819</link>
    <description>A partner&#039;s share in a subsisting firm is treated as movable property for execution purposes under Order 21 Rule 49 CPC because the partner has no separate proprietary interest in any specific partnership asset; the share is only a right to receive a proportion after realisation of assets, discharge of liabilities, and settlement of accounts, and the presence of immovable property in the firm&#039;s assets does not alter that character. The appeal also abated in toto because necessary legal representatives of deceased respondents were not brought on record within time, and effective relief could not be granted without binding all interested parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (6) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275819</link>
      <description>A partner&#039;s share in a subsisting firm is treated as movable property for execution purposes under Order 21 Rule 49 CPC because the partner has no separate proprietary interest in any specific partnership asset; the share is only a right to receive a proportion after realisation of assets, discharge of liabilities, and settlement of accounts, and the presence of immovable property in the firm&#039;s assets does not alter that character. The appeal also abated in toto because necessary legal representatives of deceased respondents were not brought on record within time, and effective relief could not be granted without binding all interested parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>