https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275818 The Full Bench held that a partner's interest in partnership assets does not constitute an interest in immovable property under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act. Consequently, the unregistered document (Ex. B-18) relinquishing partnership property did not require registration and was deemed admissible in evidence. The second appeal was dismissed with costs, and an additional sum was granted as Advocate's fee due to the reference to the Full Bench. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275818 The Full Bench held that a partner's interest in partnership assets does not constitute an interest in immovable property under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act. Consequently, the unregistered document (Ex. B-18) relinquishing partnership property did not require registration and was deemed admissible in evidence. The second appeal was dismissed with costs, and an additional sum was granted as Advocate's fee due to the reference to the Full Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275818