<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 981 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369015</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the RBI&#039;s decision to include the petitioner in the list for insolvency proceedings under the IBC, dismissing claims of discrimination and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court found the RBI&#039;s criteria for selecting accounts for insolvency proceedings to be rational and within its powers, leading to the dismissal of the petition and disposal of pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 981 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369015</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the RBI&#039;s decision to include the petitioner in the list for insolvency proceedings under the IBC, dismissing claims of discrimination and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court found the RBI&#039;s criteria for selecting accounts for insolvency proceedings to be rational and within its powers, leading to the dismissal of the petition and disposal of pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>