https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369001 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner due to the lack of clarity in specifying individual liabilities for alleged clandestine removal of tread rubber without duty payment. The decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence, burden of proof, and clarity in confirming duty demands against specific entities to ensure fair resolution and proper execution. en-us Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:33:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369001 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner due to the lack of clarity in specifying individual liabilities for alleged clandestine removal of tread rubber without duty payment. The decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence, burden of proof, and clarity in confirming duty demands against specific entities to ensure fair resolution and proper execution. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369001