<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 962 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of fasteners, in a case concerning the applicability of Central Excise duty on goods sold to a wholesale dealer in boxes. The Tribunal held that the appellants correctly paid duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and not under Section 4A, based on the analysis of the Standard of Weight and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules 1977. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed without addressing the issue of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 962 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of fasteners, in a case concerning the applicability of Central Excise duty on goods sold to a wholesale dealer in boxes. The Tribunal held that the appellants correctly paid duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and not under Section 4A, based on the analysis of the Standard of Weight and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules 1977. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed without addressing the issue of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>