https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368995 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the amount retained by the appellant on account of VAT concession should be added to the assessable value based on precedent. Additionally, the demand raised against the appellant for the period 2001-2004 & 2005 was deemed unsustainable due to the extended period of limitation being invoked without clarity on the issue, following a High Court decision referencing the Apex Court judgment. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief as necessary. en-us Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:33:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368995 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the amount retained by the appellant on account of VAT concession should be added to the assessable value based on precedent. Additionally, the demand raised against the appellant for the period 2001-2004 & 2005 was deemed unsustainable due to the extended period of limitation being invoked without clarity on the issue, following a High Court decision referencing the Apex Court judgment. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief as necessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368995