https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368994 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for recalculating the assessable value based on the correct formula of adding 35% to the cost of goods under Section 4(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The extended period of limitation was found inapplicable as the Revenue did not challenge the impugned order. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand for reassessment of the assessable value in accordance with Section 4(A) of the Act. en-us Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:33:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368994 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for recalculating the assessable value based on the correct formula of adding 35% to the cost of goods under Section 4(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The extended period of limitation was found inapplicable as the Revenue did not challenge the impugned order. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand for reassessment of the assessable value in accordance with Section 4(A) of the Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368994