<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 959 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the goods manufactured by the appellants should be classified under Chapter Sub-heading 843290, with no duty payable, based on a similar case accepted by the department. Consequently, the demand for duty was set aside, seized goods were not liable for confiscation, and penalties imposed were revoked. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 959 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the goods manufactured by the appellants should be classified under Chapter Sub-heading 843290, with no duty payable, based on a similar case accepted by the department. Consequently, the demand for duty was set aside, seized goods were not liable for confiscation, and penalties imposed were revoked. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>