<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 951 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368985</link>
    <description>The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need for the adjudicating authority to pass an appropriate order in accordance with the law after providing a fair hearing to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 951 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368985</link>
      <description>The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need for the adjudicating authority to pass an appropriate order in accordance with the law after providing a fair hearing to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>