<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 950 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368984</link>
    <description>Education cess and higher education cess paid through PLA were treated as part of the duty structure, so the entitlement to refund or self-credit available for duty also extended to the cess component. The Tribunal applied the settled position and upheld refund or self-credit under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. It further held that the benefit could not be curtailed by Notifications No. 19/2008-CE and 34/2008-CE, because the restrictions imposed by those notifications had been quashed and remained inoperative. The appellants&#039; entitlement to refund or self-credit of duty paid through PLA, including cess, was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 950 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368984</link>
      <description>Education cess and higher education cess paid through PLA were treated as part of the duty structure, so the entitlement to refund or self-credit available for duty also extended to the cess component. The Tribunal applied the settled position and upheld refund or self-credit under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. It further held that the benefit could not be curtailed by Notifications No. 19/2008-CE and 34/2008-CE, because the restrictions imposed by those notifications had been quashed and remained inoperative. The appellants&#039; entitlement to refund or self-credit of duty paid through PLA, including cess, was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>