https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368980 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in an aerated water manufacturing case, setting aside the confirmed duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant. The demand was found unsustainable due to lack of concrete evidence and reliance on assumptions by the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of considering all essential production factors and highlighted the insufficiency of evidence supporting allegations of clandestine removal. The faulty investigation methods by the Revenue led to baseless allegations, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:32:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368980 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in an aerated water manufacturing case, setting aside the confirmed duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant. The demand was found unsustainable due to lack of concrete evidence and reliance on assumptions by the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of considering all essential production factors and highlighted the insufficiency of evidence supporting allegations of clandestine removal. The faulty investigation methods by the Revenue led to baseless allegations, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368980