<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1454 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It affirmed the treatment of interest cost as revenue expenditure and allowed the carry forward of business loss. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowance under section 14A does not apply when no exempt income is received, as per relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1454 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It affirmed the treatment of interest cost as revenue expenditure and allowed the carry forward of business loss. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowance under section 14A does not apply when no exempt income is received, as per relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>