<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14870</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, directing the Commissioner to review the petitioner&#039;s 1998 application for extension of time under section 80HHC on its merits, without considering the alleged 1994 application. The court clarified that it was not expressing any opinion on the disputed 1994 application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:12:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14870</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, directing the Commissioner to review the petitioner&#039;s 1998 application for extension of time under section 80HHC on its merits, without considering the alleged 1994 application. The court clarified that it was not expressing any opinion on the disputed 1994 application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>