<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1627 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275812</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chandigarh dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition under section 40(a)(ia) made by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the retrospective application of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and the legal principle favoring the assessee in cases of interpretational ambiguity. The ITAT Chandigarh&#039;s order was pronounced on 26.05.2017, concluding the legal proceedings in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1627 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275812</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chandigarh dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition under section 40(a)(ia) made by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the retrospective application of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and the legal principle favoring the assessee in cases of interpretational ambiguity. The ITAT Chandigarh&#039;s order was pronounced on 26.05.2017, concluding the legal proceedings in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>