<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1744 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275813</link>
    <description>The court found that the respondent company failed to pay the amount due to the petitioner arising from commodity transactions on the NSEL. The court ordered the respondent to deposit the outstanding sum with the court within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in the revival of the petition for winding up the respondent company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1744 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275813</link>
      <description>The court found that the respondent company failed to pay the amount due to the petitioner arising from commodity transactions on the NSEL. The court ordered the respondent to deposit the outstanding sum with the court within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in the revival of the petition for winding up the respondent company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>