<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14868</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order declaring the purchases as void under section 281(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that only courts, not tax authorities, can declare transactions void. The petitioners, purchasers of properties, had their sale deeds duly registered after income-tax clearance, establishing their title. The court emphasized that the Officer lacked jurisdiction and exceeded authority in making such declarations, allowing the writ petitions and closing the related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14868</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order declaring the purchases as void under section 281(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that only courts, not tax authorities, can declare transactions void. The petitioners, purchasers of properties, had their sale deeds duly registered after income-tax clearance, establishing their title. The court emphasized that the Officer lacked jurisdiction and exceeded authority in making such declarations, allowing the writ petitions and closing the related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>