https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275801 The dispute required fresh consideration because the High Court had not examined all material issues, including the different position of transferee employees, the dates from which enhanced pension and dearness relief were payable, and whether the relevant service rules were incorporated or merely referred to through the Corporation's adoption order and Government letter. The matter was therefore remitted for de novo consideration. On recovery, the refusal to allow reimbursement of alleged excess payments was left undisturbed because pay had been fixed long earlier, the employees were not responsible for the alleged wrong fixation, and no compelling reason was shown to interfere with the equitable direction against recovery. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275801 The dispute required fresh consideration because the High Court had not examined all material issues, including the different position of transferee employees, the dates from which enhanced pension and dearness relief were payable, and whether the relevant service rules were incorporated or merely referred to through the Corporation's adoption order and Government letter. The matter was therefore remitted for de novo consideration. On recovery, the refusal to allow reimbursement of alleged excess payments was left undisturbed because pay had been fixed long earlier, the employees were not responsible for the alleged wrong fixation, and no compelling reason was shown to interfere with the equitable direction against recovery. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275801