https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275798 The court upheld the binding nature of judicial precedents, emphasizing the importance of following decisions of Full Bench or superior courts. In a case involving restitution of conjugal rights under the Hindu Marriage Act, the trial court granted a decree in favor of the husband, emphasizing the obligation of spouses to live together. The court reaffirmed the binding nature of the Full Bench decision, rejecting arguments for reconsideration based on Article 14 of the Constitution. The case was remanded to the single bench for decision in line with the precedent, highlighting the significance of adhering to legal precedents for consistency in the legal system. en-us Mon, 31 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:13:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275798 The court upheld the binding nature of judicial precedents, emphasizing the importance of following decisions of Full Bench or superior courts. In a case involving restitution of conjugal rights under the Hindu Marriage Act, the trial court granted a decree in favor of the husband, emphasizing the obligation of spouses to live together. The court reaffirmed the binding nature of the Full Bench decision, rejecting arguments for reconsideration based on Article 14 of the Constitution. The case was remanded to the single bench for decision in line with the precedent, highlighting the significance of adhering to legal precedents for consistency in the legal system. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275798