https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275796 The court held that a Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit by a workman in connection with an industrial dispute if no steps were taken to resort to the remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court emphasized that if a special jurisdiction or tribunal is created, matters within that jurisdiction are impliedly barred from Civil Court cognizance. The distinction under Article 311 of the Constitution was deemed irrelevant. The interpretation of principles from a previous case supported the conclusion that the workman had the alternative remedy to approach the Civil Court in this instance. The case was remanded for further proceedings based on this ruling. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:55:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275796 The court held that a Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit by a workman in connection with an industrial dispute if no steps were taken to resort to the remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court emphasized that if a special jurisdiction or tribunal is created, matters within that jurisdiction are impliedly barred from Civil Court cognizance. The distinction under Article 311 of the Constitution was deemed irrelevant. The interpretation of principles from a previous case supported the conclusion that the workman had the alternative remedy to approach the Civil Court in this instance. The case was remanded for further proceedings based on this ruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275796