<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 278 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275796</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction remains available for a workman&#039;s dismissal-related suit where the underlying claim arises from rights under general or common law and not from rights created by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Disputes founded on the Act itself attract the Act&#039;s exclusive statutory machinery and civil court jurisdiction is impliedly barred; but where the right exists dehors the Act, the workman may elect either the civil remedy or the remedy under the Act. Inclusion of individual dismissal disputes in Section 2-A does not by itself exclude the civil remedy. The matter was therefore remitted for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:55:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 278 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275796</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction remains available for a workman&#039;s dismissal-related suit where the underlying claim arises from rights under general or common law and not from rights created by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Disputes founded on the Act itself attract the Act&#039;s exclusive statutory machinery and civil court jurisdiction is impliedly barred; but where the right exists dehors the Act, the workman may elect either the civil remedy or the remedy under the Act. Inclusion of individual dismissal disputes in Section 2-A does not by itself exclude the civil remedy. The matter was therefore remitted for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>