<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 252 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275792</link>
    <description>The Court found the allocation of 30% marks to the viva voce test excessive but refrained from interference due to timing. It declared the classification for regional imbalance invalid, quashing admissions under that quota. The Court emphasized the need for the State Government to revise marks allocation. Allegations of favoritism lacked substance, and the presence of Government officials on the Selection Committee was deemed permissible. Admissions under the regional imbalance quota were annulled, with seats to be filled based on open merit, aiming to mitigate harm to affected candidates. Other issues were similarly disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 252 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275792</link>
      <description>The Court found the allocation of 30% marks to the viva voce test excessive but refrained from interference due to timing. It declared the classification for regional imbalance invalid, quashing admissions under that quota. The Court emphasized the need for the State Government to revise marks allocation. Allegations of favoritism lacked substance, and the presence of Government officials on the Selection Committee was deemed permissible. Admissions under the regional imbalance quota were annulled, with seats to be filled based on open merit, aiming to mitigate harm to affected candidates. Other issues were similarly disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>