https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275789 An agreement by a salt licence holder to share profits with partners was not illegal where it did not transfer the licence, sublet the privilege, or divest the licensee of control over salt manufacture. The restrictive licence condition against subletting, sale, mortgage or alienation, and the statutory prohibition, were therefore not breached, so the partnership agreements remained valid and enforceable. On jurisdiction, the agreement was executed in Bombay, the third defendant attended and attested it, and part of the business was carried on there, which was sufficient to sustain jurisdiction against that defendant. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:01:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275789 An agreement by a salt licence holder to share profits with partners was not illegal where it did not transfer the licence, sublet the privilege, or divest the licensee of control over salt manufacture. The restrictive licence condition against subletting, sale, mortgage or alienation, and the statutory prohibition, were therefore not breached, so the partnership agreements remained valid and enforceable. On jurisdiction, the agreement was executed in Bombay, the third defendant attended and attested it, and part of the business was carried on there, which was sufficient to sustain jurisdiction against that defendant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275789