<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 941 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368975</link>
    <description>Lottery is an actionable claim and, for GST purposes, is treated as goods; the Calcutta High Court relied on Sunrise Associates to hold that a lottery ticket represents only a contingent chance to win a prize. On that basis, lottery falls within the taxable field under the CGST Act and the West Bengal GST Act, with no want of legislative competence or constitutional violation shown. Differential taxation of lotteries was also upheld because fiscal classification allows wide policy latitude and the GST Council&#039;s rate structure was not shown to be constitutionally infirm. The writ petition therefore failed and no consequential relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 941 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368975</link>
      <description>Lottery is an actionable claim and, for GST purposes, is treated as goods; the Calcutta High Court relied on Sunrise Associates to hold that a lottery ticket represents only a contingent chance to win a prize. On that basis, lottery falls within the taxable field under the CGST Act and the West Bengal GST Act, with no want of legislative competence or constitutional violation shown. Differential taxation of lotteries was also upheld because fiscal classification allows wide policy latitude and the GST Council&#039;s rate structure was not shown to be constitutionally infirm. The writ petition therefore failed and no consequential relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>