<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 936 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368970</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the notice for reopening the assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2011-2012 was invalid. The Court emphasized that since the claim for deduction under section 10B was thoroughly examined during the original assessment, it could not be reopened based on allegations of disproportionate bifurcation of expenditures between units. The Court quashed the notice, ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 936 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368970</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the notice for reopening the assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2011-2012 was invalid. The Court emphasized that since the claim for deduction under section 10B was thoroughly examined during the original assessment, it could not be reopened based on allegations of disproportionate bifurcation of expenditures between units. The Court quashed the notice, ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>