<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 926 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271 was invalid due to ambiguity in specifying whether it was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was subsequently canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:43:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 926 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271 was invalid due to ambiguity in specifying whether it was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was subsequently canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>