https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368944 The court dismissed the criminal revision petitions, confirming the trial court's orders rejecting the discharge petitions. The prosecution had presented sufficient material to frame charges and proceed with the trial. The accused's actions, including issuing false U.O. Notes and clearing undervalued goods, were found to be outside the scope of their official duties and not protected under Section 155 of the Customs Act. Consequently, the criminal proceedings against the accused were allowed to continue. en-us Sat, 29 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:42:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368944 The court dismissed the criminal revision petitions, confirming the trial court's orders rejecting the discharge petitions. The prosecution had presented sufficient material to frame charges and proceed with the trial. The accused's actions, including issuing false U.O. Notes and clearing undervalued goods, were found to be outside the scope of their official duties and not protected under Section 155 of the Customs Act. Consequently, the criminal proceedings against the accused were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 29 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368944