<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368943</link>
    <description>The court upheld the magistrate&#039;s decision to certify the inventory of seized goods under the Customs Act, 1962, in a Criminal Revision Case. The revision petitioner&#039;s objections regarding the need for inventory and the categorization of the seized gold were dismissed, with the court finding no error in the magistrate&#039;s order. The case was ultimately dismissed based on the court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368943</link>
      <description>The court upheld the magistrate&#039;s decision to certify the inventory of seized goods under the Customs Act, 1962, in a Criminal Revision Case. The revision petitioner&#039;s objections regarding the need for inventory and the categorization of the seized gold were dismissed, with the court finding no error in the magistrate&#039;s order. The case was ultimately dismissed based on the court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>