<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 904 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368938</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the validity of demand-cum-show cause notices issued under the Finance Act of 1994 after the enactment of the CGST Act of 2017. It held that the notices were valid and could be continued under the saving provisions of Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act of 2017. The court allowed the respondents to proceed with the notices in accordance with the law, with the notices deemed effective from the date of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 904 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368938</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the validity of demand-cum-show cause notices issued under the Finance Act of 1994 after the enactment of the CGST Act of 2017. It held that the notices were valid and could be continued under the saving provisions of Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act of 2017. The court allowed the respondents to proceed with the notices in accordance with the law, with the notices deemed effective from the date of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>