<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 900 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368934</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Appellant&#039;s process of retaining service charges and remitting the remaining amount in foreign exchange constituted saving foreign exchange, thus meeting the conditions of Export of Service Rules, 2005. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Service Agreement, compliance with Rule 3(2), and precedents supporting the Appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 900 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368934</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Appellant&#039;s process of retaining service charges and remitting the remaining amount in foreign exchange constituted saving foreign exchange, thus meeting the conditions of Export of Service Rules, 2005. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Service Agreement, compliance with Rule 3(2), and precedents supporting the Appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>