https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368930 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of CENVAT Credit by the Revenue. The decision was based on established precedents and legal interpretations, with the Tribunal finding the disallowance unjustified. Previous Tribunal decisions supporting the appellant's position on the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for various services, including repairs and maintenance, Air Travel Agency, tour operators, and Insurance Service on machinery, were crucial in the judgment. The ruling emphasized the significance of legal principles and precedents in effectively resolving tax disputes. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368930 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of CENVAT Credit by the Revenue. The decision was based on established precedents and legal interpretations, with the Tribunal finding the disallowance unjustified. Previous Tribunal decisions supporting the appellant's position on the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for various services, including repairs and maintenance, Air Travel Agency, tour operators, and Insurance Service on machinery, were crucial in the judgment. The ruling emphasized the significance of legal principles and precedents in effectively resolving tax disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368930