<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 890 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368924</link>
    <description>A demand for reversal of Cenvat credit based only on a presumption that the assessee was not manufacturing goods was unsustainable where port samples showed the goods to be casting/forging. Goods destroyed and sold as scrap were treated on a cum-duty basis, and duty already paid on the realised consideration was appropriated against the demand. The conceded Cenvat credit amount was confirmed. Penalties were modified by allowing the option to pay 25% of the duty confirmed within one month, while the personal penalty on the Managing Director was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:41:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 890 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368924</link>
      <description>A demand for reversal of Cenvat credit based only on a presumption that the assessee was not manufacturing goods was unsustainable where port samples showed the goods to be casting/forging. Goods destroyed and sold as scrap were treated on a cum-duty basis, and duty already paid on the realised consideration was appropriated against the demand. The conceded Cenvat credit amount was confirmed. Penalties were modified by allowing the option to pay 25% of the duty confirmed within one month, while the personal penalty on the Managing Director was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>