<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 887 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368921</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 19(5)(c) of the TNVAT Act and Rule 10(9)(a) of the Rules, except for sales exclusively to State Governments. It ruled that State Governments should be considered registered dealers for ITC purposes. The Court dismissed appeals with costs, except for sales to State Governments, allowing them to claim ITC with a State Government certificate. Additionally, the Court declined to quash the Revenue Notice, finding no violation of statutory or constitutional provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 887 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368921</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 19(5)(c) of the TNVAT Act and Rule 10(9)(a) of the Rules, except for sales exclusively to State Governments. It ruled that State Governments should be considered registered dealers for ITC purposes. The Court dismissed appeals with costs, except for sales to State Governments, allowing them to claim ITC with a State Government certificate. Additionally, the Court declined to quash the Revenue Notice, finding no violation of statutory or constitutional provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>