https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368918 The court held that the Assessing Officer erred in not providing the petitioner with necessary documents to respond effectively. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer with specific directions to provide copies of returns, allow submission of necessary documents within a specified period, schedule a personal hearing, and pass fresh orders based on the submissions and in accordance with the law. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded in the judgment. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:41:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368918 The court held that the Assessing Officer erred in not providing the petitioner with necessary documents to respond effectively. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer with specific directions to provide copies of returns, allow submission of necessary documents within a specified period, schedule a personal hearing, and pass fresh orders based on the submissions and in accordance with the law. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded in the judgment. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368918