https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368914 The Tribunal rejected nine second appeals by the assessee, upholding the assessing authority's orders. The assessee faced provisional assessment orders for nine months, claiming consignment sales backed by form-F. The defence regarding goods transfer evidence was dismissed due to lack of proof. The Tribunal did not fully examine alternative transportation routes, leaving the issue unresolved. Legal arguments cited relevant judgments on stock transfers and restricted inquiries. The Court directed the assessee to deposit 50% of disputed tax, provide security, and instructed timely assessment without deciding on merits, leaving all issues open for further consideration. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368914 The Tribunal rejected nine second appeals by the assessee, upholding the assessing authority's orders. The assessee faced provisional assessment orders for nine months, claiming consignment sales backed by form-F. The defence regarding goods transfer evidence was dismissed due to lack of proof. The Tribunal did not fully examine alternative transportation routes, leaving the issue unresolved. Legal arguments cited relevant judgments on stock transfers and restricted inquiries. The Court directed the assessee to deposit 50% of disputed tax, provide security, and instructed timely assessment without deciding on merits, leaving all issues open for further consideration. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368914