<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1248 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275779</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the disallowance made by the AO under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT emphasized the importance of assessing the correctness of expense claims before making disallowances, concluding that the expenses were mostly for business purposes and the disallowance offered by the assessee was reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1248 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275779</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the disallowance made by the AO under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT emphasized the importance of assessing the correctness of expense claims before making disallowances, concluding that the expenses were mostly for business purposes and the disallowance offered by the assessee was reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>