<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1390 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275780</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The penalty was canceled as the Tribunal found that the disallowance of commission claimed by the assessee did not warrant the imposition of penalty, considering compliance with TDS deductions and summons. The decision was based on the principle established in CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd., emphasizing that the mere disallowance of a deduction claim does not automatically lead to a penalty under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1390 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275780</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The penalty was canceled as the Tribunal found that the disallowance of commission claimed by the assessee did not warrant the imposition of penalty, considering compliance with TDS deductions and summons. The decision was based on the principle established in CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd., emphasizing that the mere disallowance of a deduction claim does not automatically lead to a penalty under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>