<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1407 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275782</link>
    <description>The appeals for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 challenging disallowances under section 14A r/w rule 8D were allowed. The Tribunal found the disallowances made by the appellant to be reasonable, considering expenses not linked to earning exempt income. The additions by the Assessing Officer were deemed unreasonable and deleted. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and a re-computation of income was directed in line with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1407 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275782</link>
      <description>The appeals for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 challenging disallowances under section 14A r/w rule 8D were allowed. The Tribunal found the disallowances made by the appellant to be reasonable, considering expenses not linked to earning exempt income. The additions by the Assessing Officer were deemed unreasonable and deleted. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and a re-computation of income was directed in line with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>