<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1391 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275784</link>
    <description>Special leave petitions were disposed of on procedural grounds in two ways: some were dismissed because counsel stated they could not be pressed in view of the circular dated 07.3.2016, and others were permitted to be withdrawn and were dismissed as withdrawn. No adjudication on the merits of the underlying controversy was recorded, and the effect of the circular was confined to the disposal of the listed petitions on the submissions made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1391 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275784</link>
      <description>Special leave petitions were disposed of on procedural grounds in two ways: some were dismissed because counsel stated they could not be pressed in view of the circular dated 07.3.2016, and others were permitted to be withdrawn and were dismissed as withdrawn. No adjudication on the merits of the underlying controversy was recorded, and the effect of the circular was confined to the disposal of the listed petitions on the submissions made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>