<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 553 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275778</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the revisional order under Section 35 of the KGST Act and determined that the notice issued by the revisional authority was within the prescribed time limit. The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in the jewellery business, and ruled in favor of the Revenue. The revision petition was dismissed, with each party directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 553 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275778</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the revisional order under Section 35 of the KGST Act and determined that the notice issued by the revisional authority was within the prescribed time limit. The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in the jewellery business, and ruled in favor of the Revenue. The revision petition was dismissed, with each party directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>